FIVEBREAK — Pro-Level English

Stay informed. Take your English further. Five minutes. Every day.

Sports · Your daily 5 minutes

Do you know what…?

Why can a 2.1 m/s breeze keep a 100-metre time out of the record books?

Saturday 3 October 2026

A wind gauge stands beside a sprint track as anonymous runners move towards the distant finish line.
Illustrative editorial image

Listen to today’s article

0:00 / 0:00

A 100-metre sprinter can win a race with a time faster than the world record and still leave that record untouched. The catch is the wind: World Athletics allows a following wind of no more than 2.0 metres per second for record purposes. A reading of +2.1 m/s puts the performance beyond that limit, however narrow the margin. The result can still decide who wins the race, but it is not for a world record. Taking the stopwatch would miss a crucial part of the contest.

A following wind reduces the air resistance a runner must overcome; a headwind increases it. Yet the official reading is not a continuous measurement of the air surrounding each athlete. For a 100-metre race, the wind is measured for 10 seconds from the starter’s signal, using a gauge positioned beside the straight, 50 metres from the finish. The reported figure is therefore a average, not a personalised account of each runner’s conditions. It provides a common basis for comparison without claiming to capture every gust along the track.

This distinction keeps two different questions apart: who won today, and how does the performance compare with races elsewhere? Record rules need a clear boundary, even though the physical benefit of wind does not suddenly jump between +2.0 and +2.1 m/s. Nor does the rule convert an assisted time into an official calm-weather equivalent. It simply excludes performances above the limit from record consideration. The broader lesson is that sporting records are not just measurements of speed: they are measurements made under agreed conditions.

Today’s expression

at face value

Meaning: Accepting what something appears to show without examining it more closely.

Example: Do not take the lower subscription price at face value; check which services it includes.

Check your understanding

18-question test

Answer all the questions, then check your results.

  1. True / False

    1.A following-wind reading of +2.1 m/s exceeds the limit for a 100-metre world record.
  2. 2.Exceeding the wind limit automatically prevents a sprinter from winning the race.
  3. 3.The official wind measurement covers a fixed ten-second period beginning with the starter’s signal.
  4. Reading Comprehension

    4.Why does a following wind matter to a sprint performance?
  5. 5.What is the main limitation of the official wind reading described in the article?
  6. 6.Inference: What does the difference between +2.0 and +2.1 m/s illustrate?
  7. Grammar & Phrasal Verbs

    7.Which sentence would sound most natural in professional English?
  8. 8.Which alternative best preserves the meaning of “keeps two different questions apart”?
  9. 9.Which wording could replace “however narrow the margin” without changing its meaning?
  10. 10.Which sentence best reformulates the warning about taking the stopwatch “at face value”?
  11. Prepositions

    11.Complete the sentence: “A performance above the following-wind limit is not eligible ___ a world record.”
  12. 12.Complete the sentence: “The wind gauge is positioned ___ the straight, rather than on the running surface itself.”
  13. 13.Complete the article’s question: “How does the performance compare ___ races elsewhere?”
  14. 14.Complete the sentence: “The rule excludes performances above the limit ___ record consideration.”
  15. Vocabulary & Synonyms

    15.What does “standardised” mean in the description of the wind reading?
  16. 16.Which expression is closest in meaning to “eligible” in the article?
  17. 17.Which term could replace “following wind” in this sporting context?
  18. 18.What does “capture every gust” mean in the final sentence of the second paragraph?

0 / 18 answered