Do you know what…?
Why can a 2.1 m/s breeze keep a 100-metre time out of the record books?

A 100-metre sprinter can win a race with a time faster than the world record and still leave that record untouched. The catch is the wind: World Athletics allows a following wind of no more than 2.0 metres per second for record purposes. A reading of +2.1 m/s puts the performance beyond that limit, however narrow the margin. The result can still decide who wins the race, but it is not for a world record. Taking the stopwatch would miss a crucial part of the contest.
A following wind reduces the air resistance a runner must overcome; a headwind increases it. Yet the official reading is not a continuous measurement of the air surrounding each athlete. For a 100-metre race, the wind is measured for 10 seconds from the starter’s signal, using a gauge positioned beside the straight, 50 metres from the finish. The reported figure is therefore a average, not a personalised account of each runner’s conditions. It provides a common basis for comparison without claiming to capture every gust along the track.
This distinction keeps two different questions apart: who won today, and how does the performance compare with races elsewhere? Record rules need a clear boundary, even though the physical benefit of wind does not suddenly jump between +2.0 and +2.1 m/s. Nor does the rule convert an assisted time into an official calm-weather equivalent. It simply excludes performances above the limit from record consideration. The broader lesson is that sporting records are not just measurements of speed: they are measurements made under agreed conditions.
